New Minor Forcing — BidMaestro

The problem it solves

Take an auction like 1♦ – 1♥ – 1NT, where the 1NT rebid shows a balanced 12–14. Responder may hold a five-card heart suit, or four spades, and enough for game, but opener’s 1NT rebid could still be concealing three-card heart support or four spades. A raise or a jump to notrump would be guessing; New Minor Forcing finds out first.

The ask

Responder bids the other minor — the one neither partner has shown naturally (2♣ after a 1♦ opening, 2♦ after a 1♣ opening). It is entirely artificial and says nothing about that minor. In BidMaestro it promises 10 or more high-card points and one of two shapes worth checking:

a five-card major, looking for three-card support and a 5–3 fit; or
exactly four cards in the other major, looking for a 4–4 fit.

How BidMaestro answers

Opener shows any major fit first, then pins down the strength:

Two of the other major: Four cards in the other major — a possible 4–4 fit, shown ahead of anything else.
Responder’s major, with three-card support: Two of the major shows 12–13 high-card points; a jump to three of the major shows 14.
No major fit: Repeating the opened minor shows 12–13; 2NT shows 14.

In BidMaestro, opener’s 2NT rebid shows 14 and the no-fit hand with 12–13 repeats the opened minor. Some partnerships play it the other way round: the cheapest rebid is the minimum and a jump the maximum. Be sure which scheme your partnership has agreed.

Over a 2NT rebid too

The same checkback works after opener’s stronger 2NT rebid, the balanced 18–19 hand. In 1♦ – 1♥ – 2NT – 3♣, the 3♣ bid asks the same question a level higher, looking for a 4–4 or 5–3 major fit before settling in 3NT.

When it does not apply

A fourth-suit-style bid at the one level is not New Minor Forcing: the convention is specifically the unbid minor after a notrump rebid. If opener has rebid a suit rather than notrump, responder’s tools are different.

← Back to all conventions